Continuing from my last post, I’ve forked Paul Hammant’s original App-Config-App and modified it to work against Perforce. I’ve decided not to continue using Perforce Chronicle as it is primarily intended for content management.
- A .rvmrc file, so you automagically switch to Ruby 1.9.3
- A Gemfile, so you don’t have to install everything individually :)
- Sinatra-Contrib for view templating support
- Rack Flash for flash messages
- HighLine for masking passwords
- json to manipulate JSON in native Ruby
Getting it to work.
App-Config-App requires a couple things to work:
- Ruby 1.9.3 and Bundler
- p4 - the Perforce command line client
- p4d - the Perforce server
All installation and example setup details may be found in App-Config-App’s README.
When you login, you should see this screen:
You’ll notice I made the extra effort to add colors and drop shadows :D The application works from the project root in Perforce, so the files in each branch are viewable here. Clicking on “Dev” > “aardvark_configuration.html” will bring up a form for editing
aardvark_configuration.json as in the previous version:
Changes to the form data are automatically saved. After making a view edits, you can click “View Diff” to get the diffs or “Revert” your changes. Go ahead and change the email address and fiddle around with the banned nicks, then go click “Pending Changes”:
This screen shows all files that were changed and their diffs as well. You can “Revert” each file individually, and if you want to commit all changes, then enter a commit message and click “Commit Changes”. If you commit the changes and go back to “Dev” > “aardvark_configuration.html”, you’ll see the new values in the form:
Security and Permissions
Permissions and security are managed through Perforce. For users to be able to login, they must have a user and client configured in Perforce. Those users must also have permissions configured in order to view or modify files.
setup_example.rb script creates three test users to demonstrate branch permissions:
Username Password Write Read ------------------------------------------------- sally-runtime bananas prod staging, dev jimmy-qa apples staging devjoe-developer oranges dev
Logging in as any of these users will hide branches that don’t have at least read-level access, and branches that don’t have write-level access won’t allow changes.
All users created by
setup_example.rb are intended only as examples. In the real world, all application users should be setup with real logins and real permissions.
It is this support for users and per-branch permissions that I am using Perforce as the SCM backend rather than Git.
setup_example.rb script also sets up three application users to demonstrate how an application would consume configuration:
Username Password Read ----------------------------- dev-app s3cret1 dev qa-app s3cret2 stagingprod-app s3cret3 prod
Application user accounts are configured in Perforce like any other user. I highly recommend that application users be given ready-only access to individual files rather than entire branches.
Right now, App-Config-App offers no UI tools for managing divergence and merging. Merges must be performed outside App-Config-App, and the specific safety nets to prevent nefarious change vulnerabilities are dependent on your branch specs and permissions configuration.
There are also are no tools to manage conflicts of existing edits with incoming changes from another user. If a Perforce sync fails due to a conflict, you are best to revert all changes and enter them again.
A better model for autosave
I’ve also noticed that the autosave triggers even when a value is invalid. The first time an email address, for example, becomes invalid, AngularJS will post back the JSON, but without the invalid email address field–the invalid field is entirely left out of the JSON structure. After that, AngularJS will stop autosaving until the value is valid. There are also no measures in place to prevent a user from leaving an invalid value and saving an incomplete JSON file.
A better model for validation
AngularJS does not offer a good validation API. The validation API is quite opaque and I haven’t found any real examples using it. The built-in form validation is inadequate. There are few ng-* HTML attributes exposing more than basic configuration parameters, and no hooks offered as extension points.
For example, I’m using regular expressions for date validation in App-Config-App. There isn’t a hook to provide custom validation checks, and regular expressions don’t perform sanity checks. Values such as “00/00/0000” will pass validation.
More example clients than the Java one needed
The App-Config-Java client is enough to show the basic idea behind caching and reloading configuration from App-Config-App. I would like to create a few more examples in a couple different platforms, possibly also showcasing “hot reconfiguration” for feature toggles.
Someone should port this to Subversion or TFS
App-Config-App should be usable by the largest possible audience. For instance, if you’re using Subversion, then you should be able to take advantage of the existing infrastructure.
The reason I point out Subversion and TFS is largely due to support of per-branch permissions.